The message of Jesus is centered on the Kingdom of God, a political reality that bears little resemblance to the systems and ideologies of this age.
Political efforts by churches and
“Christian” organizations too often are barely distinguishable from the
politicians and parties of this world’s kingdoms, especially in “Western-style”
democracies. It seems believers must emulate the ways of this fallen age to
achieve real change in society. However, this common approach differs markedly
from the teachings and example of Jesus.
When he first appeared in Galilee, Christ
was heard proclaiming the “Kingdom of God” – “Repent, for the kingdom
is at hand!” In his life and ministry, the reign of God was invading the
present age. However, his domain was entirely different from the political
systems of this world. On more than one occasion, he refused the coercive political
power that has characterized human history and institutions, including, it
seems, far too many contemporary churches.
[Photo by Harley Upton on Unsplash] |
The Devil tempted Jesus by offering him “all the kingdoms of the world.” To attain absolute power, he needed only to “render homage” to the Tempter and acknowledge him as his Overlord. Surprisingly, the One called to be the “Servant of Yahweh” did not dispute Satan’s “right” to dispense political power, though he certainly did refuse it - (Matthew 4:8-11, Luke 4:5-7).
In contrast to Jesus, over the
intervening centuries, many churches and believers have embraced the political
methods and ideologies of this present age to advance the Kingdom of God as
they envisioned it, even though that meant accommodating biblical principles
and values to the existing world order, if not betraying them.
Submission to Satan’s overlordship is
the price of political power. The kingdoms of this world “have been
delivered to me and I give them to whomever I will.” Satan’s claim
certainly goes far toward explaining the reprehensible conduct of governments
and politicians!
Although God destined him to rule all
the kings and “nations of the Earth,” Jesus refused the satanic offer
that so many others have eagerly embraced. Scripture confirmed his appointment
by God to reign over the Cosmos, yet he refused the kind of political power so
valued by this age and prized by church leaders and organizations - (Psalm
2:6-8).
Just imagine all the good Jesus could
accomplish if he held Caesar’s throne and commanded his legions! With him at
the imperial helm, would not righteousness prevail across the Empire? If ever
there was justification for resorting to State power and violence, was this not
it? Who better to wield the might and armies of Rome than the Prince of Peace?
Rather than employ political means, Jesus embraced the Way of the Cross. In the “Kingdom of God,” victory is achieved through self-denial and sacrifice. “Greatness” is measured by acts of mercy to one’s “enemies.”
Coercing others to
submit to your will or your church’s social agenda has no place in a realm
epitomized by the Cross of Christ. The “God and Father of our Lord Jesus
Christ” delights in mercy, not sacrifice.
HIS WAY
Jesus refused to become the conquering
messiah intent on destroying Rome that so many of his contemporaries desired.
The closer he came to his death on Calvary, the more the fickle crowds rejected
him. Even his closest disciples could not understand him or his mission - (Luke
4:13, John 6:15).
Before his execution, Pontius Pilate
inquired whether he was “the king of the Jews.” Jesus did not deny his
kingship, but he responded to Rome’s representative - “You say that I am a
king, and for this, I was born.” The Son of God qualified his kingship, declaring:
- “My kingdom is not from (ek) this world. If my kingdom was from this world, then my officers would fight that I should not be delivered up to the Jews. But now, my kingdom is not from here” - (John 18:33-36).
That did not mean his kingdom was
strictly “spiritual” or otherworldly. However, the source of his sovereignty
was other than the political power, corruption, and violence that characterize
the political systems of this evil age.
Pilate found no fault in him. He was
about to release Jesus, but at the instigation of the priestly
authorities, the crowd demanded that Rome’s representative release Barabbas
instead, a léstés (Greek) or “brigand.” The Temple
authorities preferred a violent revolutionary to the Suffering Servant
of Yahweh.
Contrary to the expectations of many,
Jesus “took on the form of a slave” and became “obedient unto death,
even death on a cross.” Because of his choice, God exalted him and bestowed
on him “the name, which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus,
every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth” -
(Philippians 2:6-11).
Institutional Christianity has a long history of mixing Church and State. The temptation to use political power is too great. Force always seems easier than persuasion. However, advancing the cause of Christ through political institutions always means resorting to the power of the State.
The choice is between the cruciform
path trod by Jesus, or instead, the smooth superhighway of political power
provided by the Devil. Christ declared that when he was “raised” on the
cross, he would “draw all men to me,” and not when and if seated
on Caesar’s throne.
His followers are summoned to “deny
themselves, take up the cross,” and follow the same path he did regardless
of where it leads.
Should we, the disciples of the same
Jesus who “gave his life a ransom for many,” embrace what he rejected?
Or should we emulate his example of self-sacrificial service for others? We
cannot do both.
[PDF Copy]
SEE ALSO:
- Calvary or Rome? - (When offered by Satan, Jesus refused the political power of Rome. So, why do we continue to seek what he rejected?)
- Perishing Meat - (In the end, only God’s kingdom will prevail and endure. All other political powers are transitory, and already they are passing away)
- Whomever He Pleases - (Yahweh, the God of Israel, changes the times and seasons, removes kings, and sets up kings as He to achieve His purposes)
No comments:
Post a Comment
We encourage free discussions on the commenting system provided by the Google Blogger platform, with the stipulation that conversations remain civil. Comments voicing dissenting views are encouraged.